https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103247 The Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint, ruling in favor of the opponent. The Commission held that the opponent was not obligated to allot the shares as the cheque payment was dishonored by the complainant's bank. Additionally, the opponent was not found negligent in refusing a demand draft received after completion of formalities. The Commission concluded that the opponent was not responsible for the non-allotment of shares or the alleged loss and mental agony suffered by the complainants. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103247 The Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed the complaint, ruling in favor of the opponent. The Commission held that the opponent was not obligated to allot the shares as the cheque payment was dishonored by the complainant's bank. Additionally, the opponent was not found negligent in refusing a demand draft received after completion of formalities. The Commission concluded that the opponent was not responsible for the non-allotment of shares or the alleged loss and mental agony suffered by the complainants. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103247