<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 334 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103244</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition against the company, citing a bona fide dispute over the outstanding amount for professional services. Emphasizing the need for genuine disputes and commercial insolvency to justify a winding up order, the court found that the petitioner&#039;s claim did not meet the necessary criteria. The company&#039;s willingness to settle the claim upon meeting specific conditions further supported the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 334 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103244</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding up petition against the company, citing a bona fide dispute over the outstanding amount for professional services. Emphasizing the need for genuine disputes and commercial insolvency to justify a winding up order, the court found that the petitioner&#039;s claim did not meet the necessary criteria. The company&#039;s willingness to settle the claim upon meeting specific conditions further supported the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>