https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103242 A requisitioned company meeting requires strict proof that it was actually held, with reliable evidence of notice, attendance and quorum; on the stated facts, the alleged extraordinary general meeting was not satisfactorily proved and the resolutions, including removal of directors, were treated as invalid for non-compliance with statutory notice and representation requirements. A party seeking interim injunction must approach the court with candour and disclose material prior proceedings; nondisclosure was treated as material. Territorial jurisdiction also depended on the real cause of action and nexus of the dispute, and the Patiala forum was found unsupported on the facts stated. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:29:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103242 A requisitioned company meeting requires strict proof that it was actually held, with reliable evidence of notice, attendance and quorum; on the stated facts, the alleged extraordinary general meeting was not satisfactorily proved and the resolutions, including removal of directors, were treated as invalid for non-compliance with statutory notice and representation requirements. A party seeking interim injunction must approach the court with candour and disclose material prior proceedings; nondisclosure was treated as material. Territorial jurisdiction also depended on the real cause of action and nexus of the dispute, and the Patiala forum was found unsupported on the facts stated. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103242