https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103227 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the learned Company Judge's findings. It concluded that the appellants had not made out a case for relief under Section 155, given their waiver, acquiescence, and suppression of material facts. The interpretation of Articles 7 and 8 further supported the validity of the share transfers. The court left other questions, including the mandatory nature of Section 108(1A), open for future consideration. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:48:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103227 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the learned Company Judge's findings. It concluded that the appellants had not made out a case for relief under Section 155, given their waiver, acquiescence, and suppression of material facts. The interpretation of Articles 7 and 8 further supported the validity of the share transfers. The court left other questions, including the mandatory nature of Section 108(1A), open for future consideration. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103227