https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103207 In winding up matters, jurisdiction is governed by the company's registered office and the notified territorial allocation under section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956. Where the registered office was at Bhilwara and the applicable notification placed that district within the Jodhpur seat, jurisdiction lay with the company judge at Jodhpur rather than Jaipur. The same liquidation proceedings could not proceed simultaneously before two forums, because that would create conflicting control and procedural duplication. The connected company petition and liquidation file were therefore required to be consolidated and transferred to Jodhpur, with liberty to seek ratification or regularisation of earlier orders in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 28 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:08:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103207 In winding up matters, jurisdiction is governed by the company's registered office and the notified territorial allocation under section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956. Where the registered office was at Bhilwara and the applicable notification placed that district within the Jodhpur seat, jurisdiction lay with the company judge at Jodhpur rather than Jaipur. The same liquidation proceedings could not proceed simultaneously before two forums, because that would create conflicting control and procedural duplication. The connected company petition and liquidation file were therefore required to be consolidated and transferred to Jodhpur, with liberty to seek ratification or regularisation of earlier orders in accordance with law. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103207