https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103197 The court struck out the names of plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2 from the cause title as they were not shareholders of the defendant company and lacked standing to maintain the suit. Certain irrelevant portions of the pleadings were ordered to be struck out. The court found the plaint was not properly signed by an advocate acting in a dual capacity. The verification of the plaint did not comply with the law, and the plaintiffs were given a chance to reverify within two weeks. The chamber summons was granted in part, allowing the plaintiffs to rectify the defects within the specified period. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103197 The court struck out the names of plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2 from the cause title as they were not shareholders of the defendant company and lacked standing to maintain the suit. Certain irrelevant portions of the pleadings were ordered to be struck out. The court found the plaint was not properly signed by an advocate acting in a dual capacity. The verification of the plaint did not comply with the law, and the plaintiffs were given a chance to reverify within two weeks. The chamber summons was granted in part, allowing the plaintiffs to rectify the defects within the specified period. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 22 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103197