https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103193 Consent under section 399(3) must be specific to the petition, allegations and reliefs, and the consenting members must apply their minds to the proceedings; on the facts, the challenge to maintainability failed. The validity of a petition is assessed at the date of presentation, so later withdrawal of consent or subsequent events did not defeat maintainability. The company could not unilaterally delete names from the share register; any correction had to be made in accordance with law. The application to strike off the main petition was rejected. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:30:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103193 Consent under section 399(3) must be specific to the petition, allegations and reliefs, and the consenting members must apply their minds to the proceedings; on the facts, the challenge to maintainability failed. The validity of a petition is assessed at the date of presentation, so later withdrawal of consent or subsequent events did not defeat maintainability. The company could not unilaterally delete names from the share register; any correction had to be made in accordance with law. The application to strike off the main petition was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103193