https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103191 The court dismissed the petition filed under the Consumer Protection Act, ruling in favor of the respondents. The delay in sending share certificates was deemed not indicative of negligence or deficiency. The court highlighted the speculative nature of the stock market, stating that fluctuations are common, and the petitioners could have made a profit despite the drop in share value. Consequently, the petitioners' claim for compensation was rejected as the alleged damages were considered too remote. en-us Sat, 05 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:22:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103191 The court dismissed the petition filed under the Consumer Protection Act, ruling in favor of the respondents. The delay in sending share certificates was deemed not indicative of negligence or deficiency. The court highlighted the speculative nature of the stock market, stating that fluctuations are common, and the petitioners could have made a profit despite the drop in share value. Consequently, the petitioners' claim for compensation was rejected as the alleged damages were considered too remote. Case-Laws Companies Law Sat, 05 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103191