https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103164 The court found the appointment of the plaintiff as the sole selling agent void ab initio due to lack of approval at the general meeting, barring any claims based on the agreement. The force majeure clause was upheld as a defense against the plaintiff's claims. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff for the unexecuted portion of goods and commission for shipments made but remanded the case for a fresh hearing on the counter-claims. The appeal was allowed, the judgment set aside, and the case remitted for rehearing with reframed issues. No costs were awarded, and the court fee was to be refunded. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:56:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103164 The court found the appointment of the plaintiff as the sole selling agent void ab initio due to lack of approval at the general meeting, barring any claims based on the agreement. The force majeure clause was upheld as a defense against the plaintiff's claims. The court awarded damages to the plaintiff for the unexecuted portion of goods and commission for shipments made but remanded the case for a fresh hearing on the counter-claims. The appeal was allowed, the judgment set aside, and the case remitted for rehearing with reframed issues. No costs were awarded, and the court fee was to be refunded. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 16 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103164