https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103142 A company whose name was lawfully changed and supported by a fresh certificate of incorporation was entitled to rectification of the register of members so that its new name replaced its former name in respect of shares already held by it. The court treated the change as a continuation of the same legal entity, not a transfer of shares to another person, and held that the fresh certificate was conclusive evidence that the statutory steps for the name change had been completed. It rejected the attempt to invoke transfer restrictions and found no sufficient cause to refuse correction, so the register was ordered to be amended. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:48:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103142 A company whose name was lawfully changed and supported by a fresh certificate of incorporation was entitled to rectification of the register of members so that its new name replaced its former name in respect of shares already held by it. The court treated the change as a continuation of the same legal entity, not a transfer of shares to another person, and held that the fresh certificate was conclusive evidence that the statutory steps for the name change had been completed. It rejected the attempt to invoke transfer restrictions and found no sufficient cause to refuse correction, so the register was ordered to be amended. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103142