<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 252 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103141</link>
    <description>Where a winding-up order is based on a creditor&#039;s petition, the court may recall it if the company is able to discharge its debts and no other creditor appears in support of winding up. On the facts noted, the notice was issued for non-payment of goods supplied, but the company stated it could pay its liabilities and the petition lacked wider creditor support. The winding-up order was therefore recalled and the company petition dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 252 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103141</link>
      <description>Where a winding-up order is based on a creditor&#039;s petition, the court may recall it if the company is able to discharge its debts and no other creditor appears in support of winding up. On the facts noted, the notice was issued for non-payment of goods supplied, but the company stated it could pay its liabilities and the petition lacked wider creditor support. The winding-up order was therefore recalled and the company petition dismissed as withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>