<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103137</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The case was remitted to the trial court for rehearing and, if necessary, for holding a meeting of different classes of unsecured creditors to obtain their consent in accordance with the law. The court emphasized the need for proper classification of creditors to ensure fair and equitable treatment, as required by Section 391 of the Companies Act. There was no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:20:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 213 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103137</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The case was remitted to the trial court for rehearing and, if necessary, for holding a meeting of different classes of unsecured creditors to obtain their consent in accordance with the law. The court emphasized the need for proper classification of creditors to ensure fair and equitable treatment, as required by Section 391 of the Companies Act. There was no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>