<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 299 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103125</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 applies only to employees or other persons within its specified statutory class; proceedings under that provision may be quashed against a landlord whose alleged acceptance of surrendered company premises does not establish that status. For alleged criminal breach of trust and conspiracy, quashing at the pre-trial stage depends on whether the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case, not on a full assessment of guilt. Where the material indicates knowing participation in a transaction involving a company asset and conviction cannot be regarded as remote, prosecution should proceed rather than be stifled through inherent jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:07:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 299 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103125</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 applies only to employees or other persons within its specified statutory class; proceedings under that provision may be quashed against a landlord whose alleged acceptance of surrendered company premises does not establish that status. For alleged criminal breach of trust and conspiracy, quashing at the pre-trial stage depends on whether the complaint and supporting material disclose a prima facie case, not on a full assessment of guilt. Where the material indicates knowing participation in a transaction involving a company asset and conviction cannot be regarded as remote, prosecution should proceed rather than be stifled through inherent jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>