https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103119 Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 provides ancillary procedural power and cannot create substantive jurisdiction to regulate a company meeting where the Companies Act, 1956 and the articles do not authorise intervention. A court cannot appoint an independent chairman or direct the conduct of a duly convened meeting contrary to the company's articles without express statutory authority. A request to disqualify directors from chairing future meetings requires a maintainable substantive claim, and interim relief must be connected to the main claim and capable of final grant. Appointment of a receiver over company records also requires substantiated grounds; unproved allegations of siphoning or fraud do not justify that remedy. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:00:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103119 Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 provides ancillary procedural power and cannot create substantive jurisdiction to regulate a company meeting where the Companies Act, 1956 and the articles do not authorise intervention. A court cannot appoint an independent chairman or direct the conduct of a duly convened meeting contrary to the company's articles without express statutory authority. A request to disqualify directors from chairing future meetings requires a maintainable substantive claim, and interim relief must be connected to the main claim and capable of final grant. Appointment of a receiver over company records also requires substantiated grounds; unproved allegations of siphoning or fraud do not justify that remedy. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103119