https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103101 The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioners failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized the need for full compliance with the requisition requirements, including signatures from all requisitionists. It was noted that some shareholders had withdrawn their consent, undermining the petitioners' claim of compliance. The court held that the disputed factual issues raised should be resolved through statutory remedies under the Companies Act rather than the court's writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:26:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103101 The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioners failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 188 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized the need for full compliance with the requisition requirements, including signatures from all requisitionists. It was noted that some shareholders had withdrawn their consent, undermining the petitioners' claim of compliance. The court held that the disputed factual issues raised should be resolved through statutory remedies under the Companies Act rather than the court's writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103101