<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 228 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment due to the absence of a search warrant in the name of the assessee and the lack of jurisdiction of the assessing officer at the time of issuing the notice. The assessment was found to be invalid and was therefore set aside, resulting in the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 228 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment due to the absence of a search warrant in the name of the assessee and the lack of jurisdiction of the assessing officer at the time of issuing the notice. The assessment was found to be invalid and was therefore set aside, resulting in the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>