https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103083 In de-notification proceedings under section 4(2) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, an aggrieved person must place material before the Special Court to justify removal from the notification. The Court independently determines whether the person should remain notified and is not concerned with testing the Custodian's subjective satisfaction through oral evidence. On that basis, the Custodian's cross-examination was held unnecessary, because the issue for adjudication was the validity of de-notification on the record before the Court, not the process by which the notification was originally issued. en-us Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:45:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103083 In de-notification proceedings under section 4(2) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992, an aggrieved person must place material before the Special Court to justify removal from the notification. The Court independently determines whether the person should remain notified and is not concerned with testing the Custodian's subjective satisfaction through oral evidence. On that basis, the Custodian's cross-examination was held unnecessary, because the issue for adjudication was the validity of de-notification on the record before the Court, not the process by which the notification was originally issued. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103083