<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 377 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103076</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for interim injunction, allowing respondent No. 1 company to proceed with the issue of rights shares. The judgment emphasized that the directors&#039; decision to issue shares should not be interfered with unless extreme circumstances warrant such interference, finding no prima facie case of mala fides, breach of trust, or personal aggrandizement by the directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 377 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103076</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for interim injunction, allowing respondent No. 1 company to proceed with the issue of rights shares. The judgment emphasized that the directors&#039; decision to issue shares should not be interfered with unless extreme circumstances warrant such interference, finding no prima facie case of mala fides, breach of trust, or personal aggrandizement by the directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>