https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103074 The High Court upheld the Company Law Board's findings on the petitioners' standing, illegality of duplicate certificates, improper removal from the Register of Members, and the need for rectification. Appeals challenging these findings were dismissed, supporting the decision to rectify the Register and reinstate the second respondent's name. The Court modified the direction on repayment, stating the second respondent was not liable, allowing respondents 17 to 19 to pursue claims against the directors if needed. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:14:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103074 The High Court upheld the Company Law Board's findings on the petitioners' standing, illegality of duplicate certificates, improper removal from the Register of Members, and the need for rectification. Appeals challenging these findings were dismissed, supporting the decision to rectify the Register and reinstate the second respondent's name. The Court modified the direction on repayment, stating the second respondent was not liable, allowing respondents 17 to 19 to pursue claims against the directors if needed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103074