<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 399 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103071</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up application of Zinc Products and Company Private Limited due to lack of proper authorization from the board of directors. The court emphasized that individual directors must have explicit authorization to institute legal proceedings on behalf of the company. Despite bounced cheques issued by the opposing party, the court deemed the lack of authorization as a fatal defect, leading to the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:08:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 399 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103071</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up application of Zinc Products and Company Private Limited due to lack of proper authorization from the board of directors. The court emphasized that individual directors must have explicit authorization to institute legal proceedings on behalf of the company. Despite bounced cheques issued by the opposing party, the court deemed the lack of authorization as a fatal defect, leading to the application&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>