https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103052 Refusal to register a share transfer was not treated as a restrictive or unfair trade practice where the shares remained in the deceased shareholder's name, rival claims to title and heirship were pending, and a partition dispute was sub judice. The applicable framework recognised that refusal could be justified in specified circumstances under securities law, and the aggrieved party had a separate statutory remedy under company law. On that basis, no material established any prohibited trade practice by the company, and the review was not maintainable under the MRTP Act. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103052 Refusal to register a share transfer was not treated as a restrictive or unfair trade practice where the shares remained in the deceased shareholder's name, rival claims to title and heirship were pending, and a partition dispute was sub judice. The applicable framework recognised that refusal could be justified in specified circumstances under securities law, and the aggrieved party had a separate statutory remedy under company law. On that basis, no material established any prohibited trade practice by the company, and the review was not maintainable under the MRTP Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103052