https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103043 A consumer complaint involving allegations of concealment, misrepresentation, project viability, financing arrangements, machinery supply and defaults was found unsuitable for summary adjudication. Because resolving the dispute would require detailed oral evidence and scrutiny of extensive documents, the Commission held that such fact-intensive issues fall beyond the limited scope of time-bound consumer proceedings. The complaint was therefore not maintainable in the Commission's summary jurisdiction, and the complainant was relegated to the ordinary remedy by way of suit or other appropriate remedies. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103043 A consumer complaint involving allegations of concealment, misrepresentation, project viability, financing arrangements, machinery supply and defaults was found unsuitable for summary adjudication. Because resolving the dispute would require detailed oral evidence and scrutiny of extensive documents, the Commission held that such fact-intensive issues fall beyond the limited scope of time-bound consumer proceedings. The complaint was therefore not maintainable in the Commission's summary jurisdiction, and the complainant was relegated to the ordinary remedy by way of suit or other appropriate remedies. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103043