<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103036</link>
    <description>Factory-gate sales to dealers were treated as buyer-seller transactions, because the invoices, lorry receipts, price lists, and dealer-wise accounts showed title and possession passing on removal, and the dealer arrangements lacked the incidents of agency. On that basis, the factory gate remained the place of removal for valuation. Once that relationship was accepted, post-sale or dealer-side expenses such as show-room and workshop costs, sales promotion, PDI, freight, transit insurance, interest on receivables, collection charges, advances, and similar additions were not includible in assessable value. Cash discount was allowed as a deduction, and sales below cost were not rejected absent proof of non-genuine sales. The valuation, duty demand, interest, and penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 503 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103036</link>
      <description>Factory-gate sales to dealers were treated as buyer-seller transactions, because the invoices, lorry receipts, price lists, and dealer-wise accounts showed title and possession passing on removal, and the dealer arrangements lacked the incidents of agency. On that basis, the factory gate remained the place of removal for valuation. Once that relationship was accepted, post-sale or dealer-side expenses such as show-room and workshop costs, sales promotion, PDI, freight, transit insurance, interest on receivables, collection charges, advances, and similar additions were not includible in assessable value. Cash discount was allowed as a deduction, and sales below cost were not rejected absent proof of non-genuine sales. The valuation, duty demand, interest, and penalties were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>