<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103025</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the debt was not proven to be owed by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct debt liability to warrant winding up under the Companies Act. The petitioner was granted the option to pursue the sister concern for the outstanding amount, highlighting the importance of clarity in debt obligations for winding-up proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:09:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103025</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the debt was not proven to be owed by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the necessity of establishing a direct debt liability to warrant winding up under the Companies Act. The petitioner was granted the option to pursue the sister concern for the outstanding amount, highlighting the importance of clarity in debt obligations for winding-up proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>