<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 268 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103022</link>
    <description>The court upheld the injunction against the appellant from using the word &#039;MONTARI&#039; in its corporate name. It found that the respondent demonstrated a likelihood of confusion and potential harm to its reputation and goodwill. The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of protecting reputation and goodwill in business and highlighting that the appellant&#039;s use of the name was not innocent but likely intended to mislead the public.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 268 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103022</link>
      <description>The court upheld the injunction against the appellant from using the word &#039;MONTARI&#039; in its corporate name. It found that the respondent demonstrated a likelihood of confusion and potential harm to its reputation and goodwill. The court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of protecting reputation and goodwill in business and highlighting that the appellant&#039;s use of the name was not innocent but likely intended to mislead the public.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>