https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103018 The High Court held that the Company Law Board had jurisdiction to direct rectification of the register of members. It also found that the Regional Bench did not contradict the Principal Bench's injunction and maintained the status quo of shares. The application for stay was denied, and the company was instructed to comply with the Board's order within an extended timeframe. The court emphasized strict adherence to the law and promptly provided both parties with a certified copy of the order. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:44:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103018 The High Court held that the Company Law Board had jurisdiction to direct rectification of the register of members. It also found that the Regional Bench did not contradict the Principal Bench's injunction and maintained the status quo of shares. The application for stay was denied, and the company was instructed to comply with the Board's order within an extended timeframe. The court emphasized strict adherence to the law and promptly provided both parties with a certified copy of the order. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103018