<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 313 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103010</link>
    <description>A pre-notification brochure could not override a scheme framed and notified under statutory powers, because the published scheme was the authentic operative document. An inconsistent brochure representation could not found promissory estoppel, and compliance with the notified scheme did not amount to deficiency in service merely because the brochure suggested a different maturity period. The consumer fora also could not compel the Trust to exercise its discretionary power to relax, vary or modify the scheme, as that discretion remained with the authority designated by the scheme. The notified statutory scheme therefore governed the parties&#039; rights, and the complaint failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 313 - NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103010</link>
      <description>A pre-notification brochure could not override a scheme framed and notified under statutory powers, because the published scheme was the authentic operative document. An inconsistent brochure representation could not found promissory estoppel, and compliance with the notified scheme did not amount to deficiency in service merely because the brochure suggested a different maturity period. The consumer fora also could not compel the Trust to exercise its discretionary power to relax, vary or modify the scheme, as that discretion remained with the authority designated by the scheme. The notified statutory scheme therefore governed the parties&#039; rights, and the complaint failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>