https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103001 The Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held that the District Forum in Jalandhar lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaints due to the absence of a cause of action within its territory. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to difficulties in obtaining the certified copy of the impugned order. The finding of deficiency in service by the appellant regarding the delivery of shares was reversed. The District Forum was found to have exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief beyond the scope of the original complaint, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned orders set aside without costs. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103001 The Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held that the District Forum in Jalandhar lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaints due to the absence of a cause of action within its territory. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to difficulties in obtaining the certified copy of the impugned order. The finding of deficiency in service by the appellant regarding the delivery of shares was reversed. The District Forum was found to have exceeded its jurisdiction by granting relief beyond the scope of the original complaint, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned orders set aside without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103001