<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 229 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103000</link>
    <description>A disciplinary or suspension power under exchange bye-laws cannot be used to enforce an unadjudicated inter-member monetary claim where the governing scheme requires the dispute to be first referred to arbitration. Interim protection was therefore granted against coercive action based on the disputed sum. However, an alleged failure to report transactions raised a separate bye-law issue, and action on that ground was not restrained at the interim stage because it could still independently attract discipline if established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 229 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103000</link>
      <description>A disciplinary or suspension power under exchange bye-laws cannot be used to enforce an unadjudicated inter-member monetary claim where the governing scheme requires the dispute to be first referred to arbitration. Interim protection was therefore granted against coercive action based on the disputed sum. However, an alleged failure to report transactions raised a separate bye-law issue, and action on that ground was not restrained at the interim stage because it could still independently attract discipline if established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>