<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102999</link>
    <description>The court upheld the order requiring the official liquidator to file a report under the second proviso to subsection (1) of section 394 for the transferor-companies not in liquidation. The appeals were dismissed without costs, emphasizing the importance of the official liquidator&#039;s report in the dissolution process and clarifying the official liquidator&#039;s broader role under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102999</link>
      <description>The court upheld the order requiring the official liquidator to file a report under the second proviso to subsection (1) of section 394 for the transferor-companies not in liquidation. The appeals were dismissed without costs, emphasizing the importance of the official liquidator&#039;s report in the dissolution process and clarifying the official liquidator&#039;s broader role under the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>