<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 284 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102991</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court directed the respondents to pay an additional Rs. 66 lakhs to the appellants within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs. 11 lakhs already deposited, in accordance with the consent terms. The Court rejected the appellants&#039; argument regarding the default clause, emphasizing that it did not apply to non-payment of interest. The judgment&#039;s directions would become effective upon payment of the additional amount, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 284 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102991</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court directed the respondents to pay an additional Rs. 66 lakhs to the appellants within eight weeks, in addition to the Rs. 11 lakhs already deposited, in accordance with the consent terms. The Court rejected the appellants&#039; argument regarding the default clause, emphasizing that it did not apply to non-payment of interest. The judgment&#039;s directions would become effective upon payment of the additional amount, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>