<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 641 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102980</link>
    <description>The case involved the classification of imported heptene/nonene and the applicability of Customs Notification 158/76. The Central Board of Excise and Customs classified heptene/nonene as &quot;Raw Naphtha&quot; and &quot;ATF.&quot; The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the benefit of the notification, interpreting the word &quot;and&quot; as &quot;or.&quot; The Commissioner held that the demand for customs duty was time-barred. The majority decision expanded the notification&#039;s scope to include petrochemicals other than fertilizers. The final order set aside the previous finding and remanded the case to verify compliance with procedural conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:49:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 641 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102980</link>
      <description>The case involved the classification of imported heptene/nonene and the applicability of Customs Notification 158/76. The Central Board of Excise and Customs classified heptene/nonene as &quot;Raw Naphtha&quot; and &quot;ATF.&quot; The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the benefit of the notification, interpreting the word &quot;and&quot; as &quot;or.&quot; The Commissioner held that the demand for customs duty was time-barred. The majority decision expanded the notification&#039;s scope to include petrochemicals other than fertilizers. The final order set aside the previous finding and remanded the case to verify compliance with procedural conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>