<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 687 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102978</link>
    <description>Prolonged inaction after suspension of a Customs House Agent licence can render the continuing suspension unjustified, even where irregularities have been noticed. The Tribunal noted that the licensing authority was required to proceed with promptness and effective progress, and that the matter had remained pending for an extended period without meaningful advancement. On those facts, the continued suspension was treated as undue hardship affecting the appellant&#039;s business, and the suspension order was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:47:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 687 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102978</link>
      <description>Prolonged inaction after suspension of a Customs House Agent licence can render the continuing suspension unjustified, even where irregularities have been noticed. The Tribunal noted that the licensing authority was required to proceed with promptness and effective progress, and that the matter had remained pending for an extended period without meaningful advancement. On those facts, the continued suspension was treated as undue hardship affecting the appellant&#039;s business, and the suspension order was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>