https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102975 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai, allowed the appeal in the case concerning the classification of goods, invocation of a larger period for duty demands, and suppression of facts leading to the penalty imposition. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed differential duty demand, ruling in favor of the appellants. It emphasized that demands in cases of reclassification should be prospective rather than retrospective, aligning with legal principles and precedents. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:33:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102975 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai, allowed the appeal in the case concerning the classification of goods, invocation of a larger period for duty demands, and suppression of facts leading to the penalty imposition. The Tribunal set aside the confirmed differential duty demand, ruling in favor of the appellants. It emphasized that demands in cases of reclassification should be prospective rather than retrospective, aligning with legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102975