<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 866 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102972</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was allowed for forklift trucks manufactured and captively used in the assessee&#039;s final product because the same issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case. In the absence of any shown stay or reversal by a higher court, that earlier view was followed in the subsequent proceeding, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. The stated principle is that a prior decision on the same issue in the assessee&#039;s own case should ordinarily govern later proceedings unless it has been stayed or reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 866 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102972</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 217/86-C.E. was allowed for forklift trucks manufactured and captively used in the assessee&#039;s final product because the same issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case. In the absence of any shown stay or reversal by a higher court, that earlier view was followed in the subsequent proceeding, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed. The stated principle is that a prior decision on the same issue in the assessee&#039;s own case should ordinarily govern later proceedings unless it has been stayed or reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>