https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102962 The case involved the classification of HDPE tapes, fabrics, and sacks under chapter sub-heading 3920.32. The CEGAT's classification was upheld based on precedents from the M.P. High Court and Tribunal cases, settling the issue. The Tribunal also held that demands raised should be set aside as the Asstt. Collector's order was based on incorrect directives, following the judgment in Bharat Commerce Industries. Consequently, all 6 appeals were rejected, affirming the proper classification and setting aside of demands. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:10:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102962 The case involved the classification of HDPE tapes, fabrics, and sacks under chapter sub-heading 3920.32. The CEGAT's classification was upheld based on precedents from the M.P. High Court and Tribunal cases, settling the issue. The Tribunal also held that demands raised should be set aside as the Asstt. Collector's order was based on incorrect directives, following the judgment in Bharat Commerce Industries. Consequently, all 6 appeals were rejected, affirming the proper classification and setting aside of demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102962