<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 730 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102959</link>
    <description>Press-mud generated in sugar manufacture was treated as residual waste, not as a final product or by-product, and was found not marketable and therefore not excisable. On that basis, Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, which applies where a manufacturer clears both dutiable and exempted or nil-rated final products, was considered inapplicable because an item that is not excisable does not become an exempted product. The related demand of 8% of sale value and the connected penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 730 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102959</link>
      <description>Press-mud generated in sugar manufacture was treated as residual waste, not as a final product or by-product, and was found not marketable and therefore not excisable. On that basis, Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, which applies where a manufacturer clears both dutiable and exempted or nil-rated final products, was considered inapplicable because an item that is not excisable does not become an exempted product. The related demand of 8% of sale value and the connected penalty were therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>