<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 365 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102931</link>
    <description>Marketability determines whether an intermediate product is excisable: actual sale is unnecessary where the product is identifiable, has a definite use, can be isolated and has adequate shelf life. P.C. acid, though captively consumed, was treated as a well-defined organic chemical capable of marketability and therefore liable to central excise duty. Incomplete disclosure of its manufacture in the classification list, declaration and supporting write-up prevented the Department from identifying its emergence. That non-disclosure constituted suppression of material facts, permitting invocation of the extended limitation period. The duty demand and connected penalty were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 365 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102931</link>
      <description>Marketability determines whether an intermediate product is excisable: actual sale is unnecessary where the product is identifiable, has a definite use, can be isolated and has adequate shelf life. P.C. acid, though captively consumed, was treated as a well-defined organic chemical capable of marketability and therefore liable to central excise duty. Incomplete disclosure of its manufacture in the classification list, declaration and supporting write-up prevented the Department from identifying its emergence. That non-disclosure constituted suppression of material facts, permitting invocation of the extended limitation period. The duty demand and connected penalty were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>