<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102900</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous shift-wise production records, together with enquiries showing that the alleged outside suppliers were fictitious, were treated as reliable material to support a finding of suppressed production and clandestine clearances; the duty demand was therefore sustained. Penalty treatment depended on the legal status of the noticees: the penalty on the proprietorship concern was set aside because a proprietorship cannot be penalised separately from its proprietor in the manner imposed, while the penalties on the proprietor and the person in charge were retained but reduced having regard to the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:37:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 279 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102900</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous shift-wise production records, together with enquiries showing that the alleged outside suppliers were fictitious, were treated as reliable material to support a finding of suppressed production and clandestine clearances; the duty demand was therefore sustained. Penalty treatment depended on the legal status of the noticees: the penalty on the proprietorship concern was set aside because a proprietorship cannot be penalised separately from its proprietor in the manner imposed, while the penalties on the proprietor and the person in charge were retained but reduced having regard to the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>