<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102899</link>
    <description>Scrap generated during the processing and coiling of tungsten wire, tungsten filament, molybdenum wire and similar materials was treated as waste with no commercial value. Prior Tribunal decisions held that such material was not exigible to duty as a manufactured product, and that view was applied here. On that basis, the scrap was held not excisable under Tariff Item 68, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:36:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 294 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102899</link>
      <description>Scrap generated during the processing and coiling of tungsten wire, tungsten filament, molybdenum wire and similar materials was treated as waste with no commercial value. Prior Tribunal decisions held that such material was not exigible to duty as a manufactured product, and that view was applied here. On that basis, the scrap was held not excisable under Tariff Item 68, and the departmental appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>