<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 376 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102897</link>
    <description>Molten iron emerging at an intermediate stage and captively used in making exempt final products was treated as not marketable and therefore not excisable. The Tribunal followed its earlier majority view that molten iron at about 1300 C is not a commercial commodity, so mere tariff coverage does not by itself attract excise duty. On that basis, the duty demand on the intermediate product was held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 376 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102897</link>
      <description>Molten iron emerging at an intermediate stage and captively used in making exempt final products was treated as not marketable and therefore not excisable. The Tribunal followed its earlier majority view that molten iron at about 1300 C is not a commercial commodity, so mere tariff coverage does not by itself attract excise duty. On that basis, the duty demand on the intermediate product was held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>