<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 366 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102894</link>
    <description>Where factory gate sales are available and an ex-factory price can be ascertained, that price governs valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Depot sales do not displace the factory gate benchmark merely because they are substantial, and transportation charges are not relevant to the assessable value on that basis. The valuation adopted by the lower appellate authority was sustained, and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 366 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102894</link>
      <description>Where factory gate sales are available and an ex-factory price can be ascertained, that price governs valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Depot sales do not displace the factory gate benchmark merely because they are substantial, and transportation charges are not relevant to the assessable value on that basis. The valuation adopted by the lower appellate authority was sustained, and the Department&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>