<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102892</link>
    <description>The cost of inserts used in sleepers is includible in the assessable value under section 4 because an earlier decision on identical facts had already treated inserts as part of that value. Applying the same reasoning to similar factual circumstances, the Tribunal followed the existing view and accepted the department&#039;s position. The operative effect is that insert cost forms part of the assessable value of sleepers for valuation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 323 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102892</link>
      <description>The cost of inserts used in sleepers is includible in the assessable value under section 4 because an earlier decision on identical facts had already treated inserts as part of that value. Applying the same reasoning to similar factual circumstances, the Tribunal followed the existing view and accepted the department&#039;s position. The operative effect is that insert cost forms part of the assessable value of sleepers for valuation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>