https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102878 Repeated adjournment requests and failure to prosecute an appeal diligently justified dismissal for non-prosecution, as the Tribunal found a casual approach by the appellant's counsel and no satisfactory basis for further delay. The Bench noted that the matter had already been adjourned several times, despite an earlier direction that no further adjournments be granted, and held that its discretion to refuse another adjournment should be exercised to protect the orderly functioning of the forum. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. en-us Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102878 Repeated adjournment requests and failure to prosecute an appeal diligently justified dismissal for non-prosecution, as the Tribunal found a casual approach by the appellant's counsel and no satisfactory basis for further delay. The Bench noted that the matter had already been adjourned several times, despite an earlier direction that no further adjournments be granted, and held that its discretion to refuse another adjournment should be exercised to protect the orderly functioning of the forum. On that basis, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102878