<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 303 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102870</link>
    <description>Goods were classified by their essential character and intended use: fibre-tipped overhead projection pens with non-permanent ink, usable for writing and marking on multiple surfaces, fell under Heading 9608.20 as writing instruments and porous-tipped markers rather than Heading 9017.20 as drawing pens. The classification under Heading 9608.20 was confirmed. On redemption fine, a long-standing practice of clearing similar goods without objection, coupled with a change in treatment made without prior public notice and without a proper computation of commercial factors such as margin of profit and clearance costs, meant the fine could not be sustained. The redemption fine was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:02:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 303 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102870</link>
      <description>Goods were classified by their essential character and intended use: fibre-tipped overhead projection pens with non-permanent ink, usable for writing and marking on multiple surfaces, fell under Heading 9608.20 as writing instruments and porous-tipped markers rather than Heading 9017.20 as drawing pens. The classification under Heading 9608.20 was confirmed. On redemption fine, a long-standing practice of clearing similar goods without objection, coupled with a change in treatment made without prior public notice and without a proper computation of commercial factors such as margin of profit and clearance costs, meant the fine could not be sustained. The redemption fine was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>