<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 354 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all applications in the case, including the rectification of mistake and stay applications. The duty demand was set aside, penalties imposed on partners were annulled, and it was clarified that penalties cannot be imposed simultaneously on a partnership firm and its partners. The Commissioner&#039;s application for rectification of mistake challenging the order was also dismissed, with the Tribunal stating it is not its function to fill gaps in the adjudication order. The High Court found the stay application groundless after a significant deposit was made, rendering it irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 354 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all applications in the case, including the rectification of mistake and stay applications. The duty demand was set aside, penalties imposed on partners were annulled, and it was clarified that penalties cannot be imposed simultaneously on a partnership firm and its partners. The Commissioner&#039;s application for rectification of mistake challenging the order was also dismissed, with the Tribunal stating it is not its function to fill gaps in the adjudication order. The High Court found the stay application groundless after a significant deposit was made, rendering it irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>