<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102832</link>
    <description>Job-work clearances must be valued under the Ujagar Prints principle by adding raw material cost, packing charges and job-work charges, including the job worker&#039;s margin of profit. The Department cannot reject that valuation merely because identical goods manufactured in another unit of the same assessee attract a higher assessable value. A separate contention on brand name value was not entertained because it was not raised in the show cause notice. The note reaffirms that job-work valuation follows the established Ujagar Prints basis unless the notice itself puts the relevant valuation issue in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:29:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 374 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102832</link>
      <description>Job-work clearances must be valued under the Ujagar Prints principle by adding raw material cost, packing charges and job-work charges, including the job worker&#039;s margin of profit. The Department cannot reject that valuation merely because identical goods manufactured in another unit of the same assessee attract a higher assessable value. A separate contention on brand name value was not entertained because it was not raised in the show cause notice. The note reaffirms that job-work valuation follows the established Ujagar Prints basis unless the notice itself puts the relevant valuation issue in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>