<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 370 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102828</link>
    <description>The adjudicating authority must quantify both duty liability and redemption fine before passing an effective order. Where the operative portion leaves these amounts indeterminate, the order cannot stand in its present form. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication so that the duty and redemption fine could be worked out precisely and a new order passed after giving the party an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:25:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 370 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102828</link>
      <description>The adjudicating authority must quantify both duty liability and redemption fine before passing an effective order. Where the operative portion leaves these amounts indeterminate, the order cannot stand in its present form. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh adjudication so that the duty and redemption fine could be worked out precisely and a new order passed after giving the party an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>