<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 372 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a stay in the case concerning the duty rate for goods cleared from an EOU without Development Commissioner&#039;s permission, citing the Kuntal Granites decision and a relevant circular. However, the Tribunal expressed reservations about the correctness of this decision, highlighting discrepancies in duty liabilities for DTA units and EOUs under the Central Excise Act. It found the interpretation from Kuntal Granites creating an anomalous situation and doubted its alignment with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the SIV Industries case. The matter was directed to be referred to a Larger Bench for clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 372 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a stay in the case concerning the duty rate for goods cleared from an EOU without Development Commissioner&#039;s permission, citing the Kuntal Granites decision and a relevant circular. However, the Tribunal expressed reservations about the correctness of this decision, highlighting discrepancies in duty liabilities for DTA units and EOUs under the Central Excise Act. It found the interpretation from Kuntal Granites creating an anomalous situation and doubted its alignment with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in the SIV Industries case. The matter was directed to be referred to a Larger Bench for clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>