<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 342 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102792</link>
    <description>Printed law reports containing recent decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts can qualify as newspapers under section 2(b) because reports of judicial decisions are treated as public news for readers concerned with law and legal administration. The Court also applied the Act&#039;s beneficial purpose and held that, once the publications were newspapers, the persons engaged in their production or publication fell within the statutory scheme and were entitled to the Act&#039;s benefits and the Palekar-based orders. The appeal succeeded, the High Court judgment was set aside, and the respondent&#039;s writ petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 342 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102792</link>
      <description>Printed law reports containing recent decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts can qualify as newspapers under section 2(b) because reports of judicial decisions are treated as public news for readers concerned with law and legal administration. The Court also applied the Act&#039;s beneficial purpose and held that, once the publications were newspapers, the persons engaged in their production or publication fell within the statutory scheme and were entitled to the Act&#039;s benefits and the Palekar-based orders. The appeal succeeded, the High Court judgment was set aside, and the respondent&#039;s writ petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>